Thursday, 16 September 2010

DJ Heftys “Death Techno Mix” – Dark Ass Minimal Techno Mix

Here at techno music news we like to try and push up and coming talent so when I came across DJ Heftys "Death Techno Mix" I had to re post it here for our readers. Its got a nice mix of the deep and dark along with some straight up minimal techno sounds and a dash of the movie soundtrack about it. Check it out I don't think you'll be disappointed.

 

 

Track Listing:

 

Intro: Lo Pan's Domain - John Carpenter, Alan Howarth - Big Trouble In Little China Soundtrack

1 – No Escape – Hefty – Unsigned

2 – Parasitic Organism – Hefty – Unsigned

3 – Blind – Logotech – Naked Lunch

4 – Hazakura (Alex Bau Remix) – SIDE B – Hysterical

5 – Tonkass (Rene Walther Remix) – Plankton, Alejandro Trebor - Amazone Records

6 – Third Eye (Fallhead Remix) – Adrenalinoman - Enter

7 – Archlekt – Subfractal – Sleaze Records

8 – Prehistoric – Hugo Palxao, Jason Fernandes – Nutempo

9 – Mask The Expression – Jason Fernandes - Dont Look Productions

10 – Effekthascher – Flinsch ‘n’ Nielson – Kiddazfm

Outro: Lo Pan's Domain - John Carpenter, Alan Howarth - Big Trouble In Little China Soundtrack

 

DJ Heftys Bio:

 

Hefty has always had a passion for music and has always had an eclectic taste. His love for music didn’t manifest itself in the form of  djing/producing until a few years back when he was introduced by a  university friend to the London underground party scene. Blown away by  the exciting venues, amazing music and incredible atmosphere he was  drawn in to the underground and never left. After a years of parties it  dawned on him, this is what he wanted to do.

 

 He left university  and bought his decks and never looked back. He owes a lot to the now legendary “PICKLE” parties which defined his bass fuelled dark Hefty style.  Priding himself on not playing the obvious and keeping to his  own style he managed to carve a name for himself playing evil electrobotic electro and hefty tek breaks, his sets known for their dark  sounds, hefty bass and varied track selection.

 

Over the years  he has built up a collection of many genres of electronic music from dubstep to techno and is more than happy spinning a set of a variety of  genres.  He has had the opportunity to warm up for Marco V at Turnmills, he has played at The Gallery also at Turnmills and has also played at  many other London clubs including Heaven, Hidden, 414, Electrowerkz, The  Telegraph, The Coronet and 333.

 

 Currently Hefty is venturing into new territory with druggy bass driven dark minimal tek and techno, incorporating aspects of the various genres he enjoys. Spending a year  working hard in his studio he has learned the art of production and has created his own unique style of dark abstract bass fuelled hypnotic  minimal, which is receiving interest in the minimal scene. With requests for remixes and collaborations flooding in and with various tracks  being released soon Hefty is determined to unleash his dark sounds on  the public and continue to explore the realms of minimal and techno.

Check out all our Techno Mixes & other DJ Mixes

Tuesday, 14 September 2010

Speedy J: Something for your mind

In advance of his appearance at Time Warp Holland, RA catches up with the head of Electric Deluxe to talk about his lengthy career in the world of techno.

"I was never really into that culture, and I didn't have a name for myself, and they were annoyed that I didn't. They said, 'You're a good DJ, and your fast on the decks, and we need to give you a name that we can use in our lyrics. We can't use DJ Jochem because that's rubbish... Can we call you Speedy J?' So I said, 'Yeah, sure. Why not?" 

In retrospect, the innocuous story of how Rotterdam resident Jochem Paap came to be known as Speedy J is fascinating. Because, more than two decades later, you'd be hard-pressed to find a producer in the techno scene that has made fewer compromises in his career. For a man so self-assured to end up with a name so strange... Well, as Paap himself laughs, "The reason I did that first official release as Speedy J was because I didn't think it was going anywhere." 

Techno fans, of course, know the punchline: It did go somewhere. Somewhere pretty big. Jochem Paap became one of the most important names in the genre in the early '90s, a visionary producer that found himself crafting dance floor bombs and futuristic art in equal measure. Before even that, however, Paap was caught by the sound of hip-hop and electro, making music in his bedroom with tape recorders and a turntable. Luckily for him, just as he was getting into the music, "everyone was dumping their drum machines and synths. They were going out of fashion, [so] we all bought them for really cheap prices." Soon, though, those same record shops where he was buying hip-hop began to stock records from Chicago and Detroit that "was completely alien."

Paap was so fascinated by the music that he heard that he knew he had to get in touch with the people making it: "I had a couple of friends who ran a radio station just outside of Rotterdam, and they were calling labels all over the world. Someone else was paying for the call..." he laughs, remembering. "They were speaking to people from Transmat, KMS and Underground Resistance to get promos. The reactions they got were always like, 'Hey man, people from Holland actually listen to our records!' They were really freaked out by it. One day they called John Acquaviva after the first States of Mind release came out, and he had the same reaction. He said that he was interested in finding out what we were doing. So I sent him two cassette tapes with forty tracks or something. When it arrived, he called me two days later: 'There are at least three singles in here that we want to release.'"



As a result, Paap became the unlikely Dutch arm of techno's second wave, his work just as curious and alien to his friends in Detroit and Chicago as theirs was to him. When Acquaviva saw him play live in Berlin for the first time in 1991, Detroit producers such as Blake Baxter were "blown away" according to an account in Simon Reynolds' electronic music history Energy Flash. "It spurred his track 'Pullover' into the huge success that it was....Speedy is as much Detroit and Chicago as anyone, and he set the tone in Europe," recalls the Plus 8 boss. Says Paap , "I had some pretty good contacts with publishing in Holland, and they didn't know anything about it. So I was sort of like their European connection for a while." He pauses. Then laughs. "In hindsight, I hooked them up with some really bad publishing deals!"

Nonetheless, the connection was strong, with Acquaviva and fellow Plus 8 owner Richie Hawtin coming over to Europe and Paap playing "weird places in Canada." On one trip, the aforementioned hit "Pullover" was presented as a candidate for inclusion on an upcoming compilation for the label. They loved it. Paap wasn't so sure. "I told them, 'If we're going to do this track, then I need to record it again because it sounds really shit.' So I re-recorded it in Richie's basement in his parent's house, but by the time I had to leave it was still five minutes too long, so he said 'I'll do an edit on my reel-to-reel.' He basically just cut off the first or last five minutes, but he made a mistake. It was recorded without Dolby but he played it back with Dolby, and it sounded really bad. By the time that record came out, I thought it was horrible. And before I knew it everyone was playing it, saying how good it was.

"I was listening to things like Armando and Mike Dunn and Steve Pointdexter at the time, and I just wanted to do a tool basically, something that you could mix into another record and have going for like two minutes and then go on—something like a break or an interlude. But people took it as a song and apparently it was really catchy. People could sing along with it, and it blew up beyond proportion…Looking back, it opened a lot of doors for me, but if I had had the choice of which track would become the big track that everybody loved, 'Pullover' would not have been that one because it just didn't represent what I was doing at the time."



Paap had numerous names under which he was releasing at the time, forgotten aliases like The Second Wave, Public Energy, Aq and DCC. But he was lucky enough to be snapped up by Warp Records for their initial Artificial Intelligence compilation under his own name, which led to an eventual album deal with the UK imprint. Both Richie Hawtin and Paap felt a kinship with Warp's interest in finding a way to push techno via the album format. Both Hawtin's effort (as FUSE) and Paap 's Ginger were released through Plus 8 and licensed for Warp's Artificial Intelligence series of albums, which also included classics such as Autechre's Incunabula and Polygon Window'sSurfing on Sine Waves.

Despite his dedication to the dance floor, Paap simply lets things happen in the studio. And figures out what to do with it later. "Some people make records where they have these fixed rules like, 'it has to have a thirty two bar intro or else you can't even mix it.' That's the stuff I don't care about. With the music that I really love to make, it just had to have a certain sound. There isn't any criterion explainable in words, it's just a feeling I have. It needs to have something that I really, really like. Every other criterion—being able to play it or tempo or even levels of how instruments relate to each other—I don't really care about as long as it makes me happy."


"It was a sound design ego trip."


Listen to some of his work from the '90s, and you'll hear exactly what he means. By the time that Paap hooked up with Novamute for his 1997 album, Public Energy #1, he felt "pretty disconnected from the dance floor." After a number of years making music to jack to, 12-inches were getting rare. "I was more into sound design and sonic weirdness and stuff like that. I had so many modular synths and things that you could get really deep into. [I wanted to do] the weirdest sounds and fuck things up really bad," he laughs. "I was really fascinated by using computers in the most extreme ways that they could be used for music… It was just a sound design ego trip I guess."

This one-man-in-the-studio-with-his-machines vibe has never been an all-consuming presence in Paap 's working methods. But it no doubt had something to do with why he embraced the idea of collaboration so wholeheartedly around the turn of the century. Novamute allowed him the platform to get together in an official capacity with a number of artists: Adam Beyer, Literon, Chris Liebing, George Issakidis. Each pairing has made for radically different results. Issakidis, Paap says, "always finds the most amazing music I've never come across. When we get together we basically bring out the wild sides out of each other, we have like our fucked up ideas, the ideas are already there, but for some reason we do crazier things then we would do by ourselves. That's just the chemistry."



When working with Liebing, however, Paap finds himself "try[ing] to piss him off a little bit. Chris is very effective and structured…so the end result usually works. It's very playable and club functional, but there's always a little twist in there that makes it more interesting." The collaboration with Liebing extends further than simply the studio: In the mid-'00s they began to play together. Paap was still solely playing live at the time and Liebing was still using vinyl, but they quickly jettisoned their set-ups when Ableton and Traktor became stable enough to use in a performance context. From there, things took off. 

"It gave us an opportunity to experiment with our styles, because we could always blame the other one if something went wrong," Paap laughs. "I was starting to get bored of playing all my material. I had a track selection of 40 tracks, and that was it, you know? But I think approaching it from my live background has helped. I never play one record straight out, it's always mangling and looping stuff and using it as an instrument…. People adopted it as a digital version of whatever they were used to, but I always try to see what else it can do—to forget what it's about and see the possibilities. I could never DJ as a traditional DJ…I don't think I could make a different doing it that way… We've been able to mix house, deep house and all kinds of weird things that didn't really belong to the genre."

Paap has never delved into house too far past marrying it to techno's relentless chug, but he has nonetheless been instrumental in slowing the genre down to a place where the two are more often compatible. When everything became hard and fast in the '90s, he was thinking things might "groove a bit better when things were pitched down eight percent." You can hear that influence in the music that has been released on Paap 's post-Nova Mute project, Electric Deluxe, where things rarely reach above 128 BPM. "I hate talking about music in terms of BPM," he says, "but it's kind of like another groove that people are looking for now."

The label has been an interesting study in contrasts. On one hand, there is the functional side. On each release, there are DJ tools that even Paap describes as "musically not that interesting" but that can be used in sets to "make other stuff more interesting." And then there are the tracks that don't bother to take the dance floor into consideration at all. With sales continuing to decline in the techno world, it certainly makes more sense than standing still—hoping that record buyers will magically return to shops. 

The label's freewheeling approach is illustrated through its varied podcast series, which features DJs playing the tracks that have influenced them through the years. It's a series which can accommodate ambient legend Pete Namlook as easily as Singapore's new techno star Xhin playing things like old school hip-hop, modern classical and indie. "For me, as a musician, I don't see much difference in the process of creation of any kind of music," says Paap . 

When asked about where he thinks techno is at the moment, he further proves the point by comparing it to an unlikely referent, "I think right now techno is completely back to its essence. It would be just like a singer/songwriter, a guitar and an amazing voice. It's very simple, very effective and true to its form. Stripped down to its essence. It's accepted to be faceless again." 

 

Reposted form residentadvisor.com via techno music news

Monday, 13 September 2010

Terence Fixmers "Comedy of Menace" albume due for relase on 27th September

Terence Fixmers "Comedy of Menace" album is a fantastically dark & raw slice of modern techno.

Comedy of Menace’ is Fixmers fourth Album. He already released two solo albums on DJ Hell’s Gigolo, the seminal “Muscle Machine” helped creat a masterful fusion between old style industrial/EBM music and techno (perhaps “Techno Body Music”?) As many will know Fixmer to this day has a side project Douglas McCarthy the legendary voice of seminal EBM band Nitzer Ebb (The Between The Devil album is a great chunk of dark aggressive techno tinged industrial). Terences third album, “Fiction Fiction” released on his own ‘Planete Rouge’ imprint in 2009 and veered far more towards deep ambience, emotive and cinematic by turns.

http://technomusicnews.com/terence-fixmer-album-comedy-of-menace-release-set-for-27th-sept/

Friday, 10 September 2010

9 music production questions with Charlie May - reposted form assivesynth.com

The first in a new series of interviews on massivesynth.com with established producers about their thoughts and processes on the topic of sound design. First up we welcome Charlie May.

As the architect behind many of the stylistic blueprint shifts in dance since the early heady days of acid house, Charlie May knows a thing or two about what makes a dance floor tick.
One half of revered progressive house pioneers Spooky; the engineer and producer of many of Sasha’s biggest singles and albums; highly respected solo producer in his own right, May has remained at the vivacious beating heart of house since the early ’90s.
 
A huge thanks to Charlie May for taking the time to give us a deeper insight into his thoughts and processes on the subject!

cm1 9 questions with Charlie May

1) I’ve read a lot about analog gear that is used in your productions. What makes analog rather than digital such an appealing choice for your music?

CM : i think now digital is finally a contender for analogue .. not just in recording quality but the plugs ins and synths are just amazing .. the beauty of analogue was that you didn’t need so much of it .. i think this still holds true. a couple of good synths, an eventide and a mixer and you can do a lot. digital toys are everywhere .. it takes so much time to firstly find what you like then actually get good with it ..

2) During the sound design phase of a project do you start with a particular sound in mind, or do you design sounds to fit specific tracks?

CM : both approaches work and are needed at different times … most tracks start with a sound .. or an idea about a kind of track or sound i want to hear. it has always been easier to just make a cool noise rather than specifically engineer a sound to fit some place specific. that’s why too much equipment makes you lazy . i am more likely to just keep flicking thru sounds and synths than stop and make something ..

3) What is your typical process when designing new sounds?

CM : there is no real method .. but i try and break down the sound in my head into smaller components and then make a decision about what machines would be best to build that sound with. much of the time i am just trying different combinations of techniques that i know do specific things. sometimes it is just a stab in the dark .. or hit the randomise button .. : )

4) You have a very unique sound and a lot of the character comes from the effects. How much of your sound is created in the synthesizer and how much is processed afterwards in your DAW ?

CM : these days there are such good fx built into synths .. but i tend to use the whole studio to build a sound .. usually always taking the sound out of the computer and thru analogue boxes and fx. then record it back in .. i add more processing at the mixing stage .. it is about layering to get that thickness .. so often sounds will be reprocessed over and over.

5) Could you pick a sound or effect in one of your released tracks and give a little insight into its creation?

CM : i use a similar approach to many sounds .. for example with something like the main riff in xpander it is all about the effect .. the delay. the original sound was from a matrix expander funnily enough .. it has this rasp to it and very complex organic but subtle movement in the sound .. that’s the trick .. to make the original sound alive so that the fx on top respond better .. a bit like making paint stick to a wall by sanding it first .. is the same principle .. effects only sound as good as what you are processing. for the delay i used a zoom 9030 .. is has a unique sound .. very mid range and the ability to chain together in interesting ways .. there is a mean chorus on that box that somehow warms and fattens the whole thing in a really unique way. i still use it alot. then it is all about compression or using envelopes to shape the transients of the sound … actually that particular sound is a sample of the original sound .. then effected all over again .. it was a mistake of sorts since i no longer had the original synth when the track was made. so double effected. with slight variation.

6) Where do you draw your inspirations from when you design new sounds?

CM : there are so many amazing new producers around now .. whose sound designing ability is amazing. but i also just listen to the world about me alot .. make field recordings .. your ear gets used to picking out certain things that are interesting in daily life .. when you stop and listen to the world you realise what an incredibly loud place it is .. and constant, ever evolving … am always looking to replicate that natural organic flux that even man made environments produce but with electronics .. so that what at first appears to repeat is in fact varied .. for that reason my bench mark record has always been eno’s ambient 4 ‘on land’ .. not only beautiful but mechanical and yet sounds like nature made it. that’s the strange thing .. at a certain level of magnification nature is math and ordered .. yet zoom out and we perceive it as chaos. maybe that’s a human survival mechanism .. so we blot out the noise .. perceive uniformity and then notice variations more .. the breaks in patterns.

7) I remember listening to an interview with Sasha talking about the influence Burial had on you guys for the direction of Involver2 at one point. How big an influence are other artists and genres when you come to design your sounds, and can you give some examples?

CM : massively so .. whether conscious or not the music you hear and like registers and often re-appears in a new form in your own work. it is wise then to listen to a wide range of sounds … for example i love dubstep as mentioned .. i love very minimal micro electronica and avante garde music .. drones and cut up/ mashed organica …the attention to detail is a pleasure to listen to. although i don’t make music in those styles they are references for technique .. so i will try and put some of that into my own music. it is sometimes less i think about the result as the approach. some music just oozes discipline and i want more of that ..!

8 ) Music production forums are full of posts of people asking how to ‘make X sound by Y artist’, it would seem people want a quick fix when making sounds. How important do you think learning synthesis is for music producers, especially in relation to creating their own sound?

CM : incredibly important .. far better to know one box inside out than have a heap of stuff you know vaguely. also one synth will relate to others so you can become familiar with new things much quicker. that lessens the learning curve. someone like barry jamieson whom i work with is incredibly fast and knowledgeable. he will pick up a new plug-in or synth and know it inside out in a few days … because he has spent time getting to know the basics and simple stuff to a very deep level. there’s no way around it .. you have to be a nerd. the geek is god.

9) If there was one tip or trick you could give us when designing synth sounds – what would it be?

CM : don’t give up or try to hard either .. sometimes the answer is just around the corner but you are trying too hard .. step back and forget what you are doing for a moment .. usually i get where i want to go when i least expect it ..when i my thoughts are elsewhere .. it’s a strange process… you kind of have to know a lot and forget it all at the same time.

 

Reposted from http://www.massivesynth.com/useful-articles/charlie-may-sound-design-interview/

See more articles, news & mixes at http://technomusicnews.com/

Wednesday, 8 September 2010

Phil Kierans Latest Techno Mix from the CLR Podcast

Weve just posted the latest DJ Mix from the excellent up and coming DJ & Producer Phil Kieran over on techno music news

Enjoy and then go check out the CLR Podcast site and Tell Chris Liebing we sent you :)

Phil_Kieran – CLR Podcast 077 16.08.2010

Track Listing

1. Jens Zimmermann – White Treasures [Snork]
2. Silent Servent – Untitled [Sandwell District]
3. Phil Kieran – Empty Vessels [Electric Deluxe]
4. Phil Kieran – Bells And Spells [Snork]
5. Patrick Iyndsy – Dr Doese Wanderleigier [Snork]
6. Phil Kieran – Pure Tension [Snork]
7. Norman – Bouncer [Relax 2000]
8. Pfirter – Arcon [Stroboscopic]
9. Terrence Fixmer – Artifacts Drastic (Planetary Assault System) [Electric Deluxe]
10. Phil Kieran – Skyhook (Adam Beyer & Jesper Dahlback Remix) [Phil Kieran]
11. Phil Kieran – Skyhook (Ricardo Tobar Ambient Mix) [Phil Kieran]

http://technomusicnews.com

Monday, 6 September 2010

Synthesizer Maestro Vince Clarke talks about his Pro One Synth..

Synthesizer Maestro Vince Clarke talks about his Pro One Synth.. Well worth checking out for synth enthusiasts.

http://www.vinceclarkemusic.com/video/index.html

 

More Synth and Techno news at http://technomusicnews.com/